In this issue

  Markal ‘‘most widely used’’ model, but...

Down the learning Curve with Emerging Technologies

Briefing Note on the Kyoto Protocol

Japan needs Nuclear Power to Reduce CO2 emissions

Markal ‘‘most widely used’’ model, but...



 

A recent paper on the use of economic models in climate change policy analysis declares MARKAL “the most widely used” bottom-up model. The paper by The Royal Institute of International Affairs also evaluates macroeconomic and general equilibrium models which are usually specific to national economies. With its application to many countries, MARKAL must then be the most widely used of any economic model for climate change policy analysis.

Alas, the article fails to recognize that MARKAL-MACRO and MARKAL-MICRO have now been developed to overcome what it describes as some of the limitations of bottom-up models. In particular, MARKAL-MACRO (1) does allow for the feedback effects of the availability of capital and fuel markets on energy demands and GDP, and (2) endogenizes economic impacts of technical options and environmental requirements.

MARKAL-MACRO combines the bottom-up MARKAL model with MACRO, a long-term neoclassical macroeconomic growth model. It was MARKAL-MACRO, not MARKAL as the RIIA articles states, that was used by the U.S. Interagency Analytical Team in 1997 to help frame the U.S. position for the COP-3 negotiations (See IEA ETSAP News, August 1997).

Reference

J. Fisher and M. Grubb, The use of economic models in climate change policy analysis, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, EEP Climate Change Briefing Paper No. 5, October 1997.

Go to Begin